Vitalis Care is nominated for the 2026 Hospice News Product of the Year Award. We'd love your support — every vote counts.

Not sure which Vitalis Care solution is right for you?

Market-rate direct payment vs. state-funded authorized services
Two distinct service funding models: private pay is direct market-rate payment by the client or family with no regulatory rate constraints; Medicaid home care is state-funded at authorized rates with strict eligibility, authorization, and documentation requirements.
Private-pay home care is paid directly by the client or family at market rates the agency sets, while Medicaid home care is funded by the state Medicaid program at state-set rates under strict authorization rules. The trade-off is margin and speed versus volume and stability: private pay generally pays more per hour and settles fast, while Medicaid provides steadier census but lower, regulated rates and heavier administration [1].
Private-pay rates are market-determined, so there is no official federal rate; the standard industry reference is the annual Cost of Care Survey. In the 2024 survey by Genworth and CareScout (an industry survey, not a federal source), the national median was $77,792 per year (~$34/hour) for a home health aide and $75,504 per year (~$33/hour) for homemaker services, each based on 44 hours per week. Private pay carries no authorization ceiling, no EVV mandate, and short payment cycles, but demand is limited by what families can afford out of pocket. Medicaid home care is the opposite profile. It is funded through the state plan personal care option or HCBS waivers, and rates are set by each state Medicaid program — there is no uniform national Medicaid home care rate, and rates commonly fall below private-pay levels. Medicaid volume is large and growing: HCBS accounted for $145.9 billion of $228.6 billion in total Medicaid LTSS spending in 2023. But that volume comes with prior authorization, unit and hour caps tied to the client's assessment, the federal EVV mandate, and longer reimbursement cycles. Some clients are dually eligible for Medicare and Medicaid, which adds coordination-of-benefits complexity.
Payer mix is the single biggest lever on a home care agency's margin, and these two payers pull in opposite directions. Private pay protects margin and cash flow but is capacity-constrained by household budgets and offers no guaranteed volume; Medicaid delivers reliable census but at regulated rates that can sit near or below cost to serve, plus the administrative load of authorization, EVV, and slow payment. Over-indexing on Medicaid personal care without watching cost-to-serve is how agencies grow revenue while margin erodes. Private pay functions as the margin engine of the two-payer model and Medicaid as the volume base, and Medicaid rate adequacy analysis requires modeling each new contract against fully loaded cost rather than top-line rate.
Medicaid generally pays less — private-pay rates are market-set (national medians near $33-34/hour in the 2024 Genworth/CareScout survey), while state-set Medicaid rates commonly fall below that level and vary widely by state.
No — each state Medicaid program sets its own rates for personal care and HCBS services, so rates differ substantially across state lines.
For volume and stability — Medicaid funds the majority of long-term care, with HCBS spending at $145.9 billion in 2023, providing steady census that private pay cannot guarantee.
No — the federal EVV mandate applies only to Medicaid-funded personal care and home health services, though some agencies adopt EVV across all payers for consistency.
Powered By nextbracket.io